en.wikipedia.org website review
Improve your SEO :: free trial!
en.wikipedia.org is 59% geoptimaliseerd!
SEO Keyword summary for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/democratic_party_presidential_debates
Keywords are extracted from the main content of your website and are the primary indicator of the words this page could rank for. By frequenty count we expect your focus keyword to be party
Focus keyword
Short and long tail
Short Tail Keywords party democratic debates |
long Tail Keywords (2 words) democratic party party presidential 2016 2020 2012 2016 2008 2012 |
long Tail Keywords (3 words) democratic party presidential 2008 2012 2016 2012 2016 2020 main article democratic article democratic party party presidential primaries 2004 2008 2012 |
en.wikipedia.org On-Page SEO Scan
Descriptive Elements
The <head> element of a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/democratic_party_presidential_debates page is used to inform the browser and visitors of the page about the general meta information. The head section of the page is where we place the page title, the definition of the HTML version used, the language of in which the page is written. In the head section we can also include JavaScript and CSS (markup) files for the page.
Page title
Title length
democratic party presidential debates wikipedia
Meta description
Meta description legth
Meta description SEO
No meta relevance in the description detected !
Content SEO
Number of Words
Spam detected?
Headings
Heading distribution
Heading normalisation
Heading SEO impact
Emphasis (bold and italic)
Emphasis SEO impact
Images
Number of images
Images dimensions
Image alt descriptions
Images SEO impact
wikipedia free encyclopedia wikimedia foundation powered mediawiki
Mobile SEO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/democratic_party_presidential_debates
Mobile rendering
Mobile optimizations
Responsive design detected (mobile css)
No flash detected !
Mobile improvement
Marketing / lead generation for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/democratic_party_presidential_debates
Social Media
Facebook shares | Facebook likes | ||
Facebook comments | Tweets | ||
Google +1 |
Conversion form
Search form
Analytics
Online presence
SERP Preview
SERP Title
SERP Link
SERP Description
Domain Level SEO
Domain name
16 characters long
Domain name SEO Impact
Path name
debate found in path !
debates found in path !
democratic found in path !
party found in path !
president found in path !
presidential found in path !
Structured data
Publisher Markup
Other Structured data
Website configuration
Correct processing of non-existing pages?
Favicon icon found?
Robots.txt found?
Sitemap found?
Navigation and internal links
Navigation
Url seperator
Human readable urls
Number of links
Link SEO Impact
statistics
|
en.m.wikipedia.org |
en.wikipedia.org wikimedia foundation inc
|
w adding missing items
httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitledemocraticpartypresidentialdebatesoldid1215370465
page information
printable version
harry chandler auditorium
|
wiki democratic party
commission on presidential debates
democratic party presidential primaries 1956
stevenson ii
senator
kefauver
quincy howe
democratic party presidential primaries 1960
kennedy
humphrey
1960 los angeles
johnson
democratic party presidential primaries 1968
robert f kennedy
eugene mccarthy
issues and answers
democratic party presidential primaries 1972
new hampshire
muskie
vance hartke
sam yorty
shirley chisholm
george wallace
democratic party presidential primaries 1976
birch bayh
carter
harris
jackson
milton shapp
shriver
mo udall
frank church
democratic party presidential primaries 1980
edward m kennedy
democratic party presidential primaries 1984
president reagan
ruben askew
alan cranston
john glenn
gary hart
fritz hollings
jesse jackson
mcgovern
walter f mondale
mondale
wendys
fastfood
wheres the beef
applause
airplane
iron curtain
warsaw pact
united states air force
cockpit
marine corps
fighter pilot
phil donahue
central america
democratic party presidential primaries 1988
bruce babbitt
biden
mike dukakis
gephardt
gore
paul simon
democratic party presidential primaries 1992
brown
b clinton
harkin
kerrey
tsongas
douglas wilder
tom brokaw
nbc
lenora fulani
irvine california
agran
billy jack
tom laughlin
ken bode
south dakota public broadcasting
super tuesday
democratic party presidential primaries 2000
bill bradley
los angeles
bernard shaw
cnn
los angeles times
jeff greenfield
ron brownstein
george w bush
university of south carolina
columbia south carolina
dean
edwards
bob graham
kerry
dennis kucinich
lieberman
carol moseley braun
al sharpton
war against iraq
wesley clark
democratic party presidential debates and forums 2008
orangeburg south carolina
h clinton
dodd
mike gravel
obama
bill richardson
libertarian party
christopher dodd
democratic party presidential debates and forums 2016
new hampshire primary
clinton campaign
second new hampshire debate
sanders campaign
march 3 debate in flint michigan
bernie sanders
pete buttigieg
amy klobuchar
elizabeth warren
republican party
united states presidential debates
the new york times
hadas gold
politico
deweystassen debate
civil forum on the presidency
cnnyoutube presidential debates
science debate 2008
the rumble in the airconditioned auditorium
citizens debate commission
free equal elections foundation
league of women voters
there you go again
senator youre no jack kennedy
binders full of women
nasty woman
united states presidential primaries and caucuses
straw polls
conservative political action conference
iowa state fair
ames iowa
texas
iowa caucuses
new hampshire primary
nevada caucuses
south carolina primary
caucuses
primaries
republican party
list of candidates by number of primary votes received
nationalconventions
1832 baltimore
1835 baltimore
1840 baltimore
1844 baltimore
1848 baltimore
1852 baltimore
1856 cincinnati
1860 charlestonbaltimore
1864 chicago
1868 new york
1872 baltimore
1876 saint louis
1880 cincinnati
1884 chicago
1888 saint louis
1892 chicago
1896 chicago
1900 kansas city
1904 saint louis
1908 denver
1912 baltimore
1916 saint louis
1920 san francisco
1924 new york
1928 houston
1932 chicago
1936 philadelphia
1940 chicago
1944 chicago
1948 philadelphia
1952 chicago
1956 chicago
1964 atlantic city
1968 chicago
1972 miami beach
1976 new york
1980 new york
1984 san francisco
1988 atlanta
1992 new york
1996 chicago
2000 los angeles
2004 boston
2008 denver
2012 charlotte
2016 philadelphia
2020 milwaukeeother locations
2024 chicago
republican party
libertarian party
green party
whig party
greenback party
1900 1904 1908
california democratic party v jones
graduated random presidential primary system
delaware plan
rotating regional primary system
interregional primary plan
national primary
second party system
third party system
fourth party system
fifth party system
sixth party system
presidentialtickets
jackson
calhoun
van buren
r johnson
polk
dallas
cass
butler
pierce
king
buchanan
breckinridge
douglas
h johnson
lane
mcclellan
pendleton
seymour
greeley
brown
tilden
hendricks
hancock
english
cleveland
thurman
stevenson i
w bryan
sewall
parker
h davis
kern
wilson
marshall
cox
roosevelt
j davis
c bryan
smith
robinson
garner
wallace
truman
barkley
sparkman
eagleton
ferraro
dukakis
bentsen
kaine
harris
presidential
administrations
jackson
van buren
buchanan
a johnson
cleveland
kennedy
l b johnson
carter
clinton
biden
us houseleaders
house caucus
a stevenson
j w jones
davis
cobb
boyd
houston
niblack
randall
kerr
carlisle
holman
crisp
d b culberson
richardson
williams
clark
kitchin
garrett
rainey
byrns
bankhead
rayburn
mccormack
albert
oneill
wright
foley
pelosi
jeffries
us senateleaders
senate caucus
j w stevenson
wallace
beck
gorman
turpie
jones
blackburn
c a culberson
money
martin
hitchcock
underwood
lucas
mcfarland
mansfield
byrd
mitchell
daschle
reid
schumer
hallett
mclane
smalley
belmont
schell
hewitt
barnum
brice
harrity
taggart
mack
mccombs
mccormick
cummings
hull
shaver
raskob
farley
flynn
walker
hannegan
mcgrath
boyle
mckinney
mitchell
butler
bailey
obrien
westwood
strauss
curtis
white
manatt
kirk
brown
wilhelm
delee
fowler
romer
grossman
rendell
andrew
mcauliffe
wasserman schultz
perez
harrison
state andterritorialparties
alabama
alaska
arizona
arkansas
california
colorado
connecticut
delaware
florida
georgia
hawaii
idaho
illinois
indiana
kansas
kentucky
louisiana
maine
maryland
massachusetts
michigan
mississippi
missouri
montana
nebraska
nevada
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new york
north carolina
oklahoma
oregon
pennsylvania
rhode island
south carolina
south dakota
tennessee
texas
vermont
virginia
washington
west virginia
wisconsin
wyoming
american samoa
district of columbia
northern mariana islands
puerto rico
virgin islands
democrats abroad
affiliatedgroups
policy committee
steering and outreach committee
blue dog coalition
congressional progressive caucus
justice democrats
new democrat coalition
problem solvers caucus
democratic attorneys general association
democratic congressional campaign committee
democratic governors association
democratic legislative campaign committee
democratic senatorial campaign committee
national conference of democratic mayors
national democratic redistricting committee
college democrats of america
national federation of democratic women
stonewall democrats
stonewall young democrats
young democrats of america
high school democrats of america
presidential candidates
superdelegate
2005 chairmanship election
2017 chairmanship election
2006 house caucus leadership election
2018 house caucus leadership election
weekly democratic address
|
Links to external pages
Outloing links
www.wikidata.org
www.youtube.com
www.debates.org
www.c-span.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
www.wikimediafoundation.org
SEO Advice for en.wikipedia.org
In this section we provide pointers on how you can to optimize your web page so it can be found more easily by search engines and how to make it rank higher by optimizing the content of the page itself. For each of the individual criteria the maximum score is 100%. A score below 70% is considered to be indication that the page is not complying with general SEO standards and should be evaluated and/or fixed. Not every factor is weighted the same and some are not as important as others. Relatively unimportant factors like meta keywords are not included in the overall score.
Item | Factor | Pointers | |
---|---|---|---|
PageTitle | 100% | Far too many sites lack a page title. A page title is the first thing that shows in the search results so always use the title element. | |
Title relevance | 100% | A title should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 80 % match | |
Title Length | 100% | Limit your title to anywhere between 40 and 70 characters. Your title was 50 characters long | |
Meta Description | 0% | A meta description is the second element that shows in the search results so always use the meta description. | |
Meta description length | 0% | The meta description should be between 145 and 160 characters. This meta description is 1 characters long. | |
Meta description relevance | 0% | Meta Description should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Number of internal links | 30% | Linking to internal pages makes pages easier to find for search engines. Try to keep the number of links on your page roughly below 100. There are 946 internal links on this page. | |
Folder structure | 100% | We found a folder structure in the links on your page. A good folder structure makes a site easier to navigate. We found 3 level 1 folders and 7 folders above or in the first level of navigation. | |
Headings | 100% | Headers should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 45 % match | |
Links | 10% | Link anchors should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 5 % match | |
Image alt tags | 0% | Image alt tags should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Bold and italic | 57% | Bold and italic tags should reflect the contents of a site to some degree. This site has a 19 % match | |
Html ratio | 30% | Try to keep the html / text ratio as low as possible. More html means longer loading times. Layout should be handled in a serpate css file | |
Image descriptions | 57% | 57.142857142857 % of all images have been described via the "alt" attribute. Describing images with relevant text may lead to better results in the search engines. | |
Page errors | 100% | Pages with no errors display significantly faster on most browsers. We detected 0 errors and warnings | |
WordCount | 20% | An ideal page contains between 400 and 600 words.This page contains 3020 words | |
Server response time | 30% | A slow server slows down a website. This server responds 232.76% slower the average | |
Gzip compression | 30% | This site does not use Gzip compression. Pages may not display as fast as they could | |
Keywords in Domainname | 30% | There are no important keywords in your domain name | |
Keywords in domain path | 100% | There are important keywords in the domain path | |
Structured Data | 100% | Structured data makes it easier for search engines to index your website | |
Inline css | 0% | Do not use inline css declarations. Inline css will slow down the rendering of the website. We detected 152 inline style declarations ( <a style="color:green">) with a size of 2665 bytes | |
Excessive use of the same words | 100% | There is no indication that there are one or more keywords that are used excessively. | |
Frames or iframes | 100% | Perfect, detected not (i)frames on your webpagina | |
Flash | 100% | Perfect, we detected no flash objects on your page | |
Css | 30% | We detected too much (2) CSS files on your page. Css files block the loading of a webpage. | |
Javascript | 100% | Perfect, we did not detect too many blocking JavaScript files | |
Mobile Website | 100% | Perfect, we found a responsive design for mobile users | |
Most important heading | 100% | Perfect, we detected a correct use of the most important (h1) heading! | |
Normalized headings | 40% | We dit not font a normalized heading structure. A heading 2 (h2) for example should be followed by a heading of an equal level (h2), a child heading (h3) or even a aprent heading (h1). |
How would you like to have SEO advice for all your pages ?? Start your SEO Dashboard and optimize your website!
en.wikipedia.org images and descriptions
7 images found at en.wikipedia.org Images can improve the user experience for a website by making a pag visually appealing Images can also add extra keyword relevance to a webpage by using alt tags. Images can also slow down a website. If the width and height for a picture is not specified for a browser know in advance how large the image is. A browser must first load the picture and see before it knows how much space should be on the page. Upon reservation In the meantime, the browser can do little but wait. When the height and width for the plate are given in the HTML code, a browser just continues to build for a page while the images load in the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png height: 50 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg height: height attribute not set width: width attribute not set description: wikipedia |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg height: 13 width: 117 description: the free encyclopedia |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/information_icon4.svg/20px-information_icon4.svg.png height: 20 width: 20 description: no alt description found |
|
https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:centralautologin/start?type=1x1 height: 1 width: 1 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.png height: 31 width: 88 description: wikimedia foundation |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/poweredby_mediawiki_88x31.png height: 31 width: 88 description: powered by mediawiki |
How are images contributing to your SEO site-wise ? Your leading content tool has the awnsers!