en.wikipedia.org website review
Improve your SEO :: free trial!
en.wikipedia.org is 59% geoptimaliseerd!
SEO Keyword summary for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_people_who_have_won_multiple_academy_awards_in_a_single_year
Keywords are extracted from the main content of your website and are the primary indicator of the words this page could rank for. By frequenty count we expect your focus keyword to be best
Focus keyword
Short and long tail
Short Tail Keywords best original awards |
long Tail Keywords (2 words) best original best picture best director picture best academy awards |
long Tail Keywords (3 words) best picture best picture best director best original song best director best best adapted screenplay best original score original score best |
en.wikipedia.org On-Page SEO Scan
Descriptive Elements
The <head> element of a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_people_who_have_won_multiple_academy_awards_in_a_single_year page is used to inform the browser and visitors of the page about the general meta information. The head section of the page is where we place the page title, the definition of the HTML version used, the language of in which the page is written. In the head section we can also include JavaScript and CSS (markup) files for the page.
Page title
Title length
list people who have won multiple academy awards single year wikipedia
Meta description
Meta description legth
Meta description SEO
No meta relevance in the description detected !
Content SEO
Number of Words
Spam detected?
Headings
Heading distribution
Heading normalisation
Heading SEO impact
Emphasis (bold and italic)
Emphasis SEO impact
Images
Number of images
Images dimensions
Image alt descriptions
Images SEO impact
wikipedia free encyclopedia wikimedia foundation powered mediawiki
Mobile SEO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_people_who_have_won_multiple_academy_awards_in_a_single_year
Mobile rendering
Mobile optimizations
Responsive design detected (mobile css)
No flash detected !
Mobile improvement
Marketing / lead generation for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_people_who_have_won_multiple_academy_awards_in_a_single_year
Social Media
Facebook shares | Facebook likes | ||
Facebook comments | Tweets | ||
Google +1 |
Conversion form
Search form
Analytics
Online presence
SERP Preview
SERP Title
The title is trucated
SERP Link
SERP Description
Domain Level SEO
Domain name
16 characters long
Domain name SEO Impact
Path name
academy found in path !
award found in path !
awards found in path !
have found in path !
list found in path !
multiple found in path !
single found in path !
won found in path !
year found in path !
Structured data
Publisher Markup
Other Structured data
Website configuration
Correct processing of non-existing pages?
Favicon icon found?
Robots.txt found?
Sitemap found?
Navigation and internal links
Navigation
Url seperator
Human readable urls
Number of links
Link SEO Impact
statistics
|
en.m.wikipedia.org |
en.wikipedia.org wikimedia foundation inc
|
w edit
/index.php?title=List_of_people_who_have_won_multiple_Academy_Awards_in_a_single_year&action=history
view history
httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitlelistofpeoplewhohavewonmultipleacademyawardsinasingleyearoldid1213135579
page information
printable version
|
wiki academy awards
walt disney
96th
academy awards
woody allen
50th
1977
annie hall
best director
best original screenplay
44th
1971
sentinels of silence
best short subject tworeel
best documentary short subject
richard attenborough
55th
1982
gandhi
best picture
burt bacharach
42nd
1969
butch cassidy and the sundance kid
best original score
best original song
john barry
39th
1966
born free
cecil beaton
37th
1964
my fair lady
best art direction color
best costume design color
robert benton
52nd
1979
kramer vs kramer
best adapted screenplay
bernardo bertolucci
60th
1987
the last emperor
kathryn bigelow
82nd
2009
the hurt locker
mark boal
bong joonho
92nd
2019
parasite
james l brooks
56th
1983
terms of endearment
james cameron
70th
1997
titanic
best film editing
michael cimino
51st
1978
the deer hunter
joel coen
80th
2007
no country for old men
pierre collings
9th academy awards
films of 1936
the story of louis pasteur
best original story
sam comer
23rd academy awards
films of 1950
sunset boulevard
samson and delilah
francis ford coppola
47th
1974
the godfather part ii
kevin costner
63rd
1990
dances with wolves
alfonso cuarn
86th
2013
gravity
91st academy awards
2018
roma
best cinematography
green book
richard day
15th
1942
this above all
my gal sal
guillermo del toro
90th
2017
the shape of water
26th academy awards
films of 1953
the living desert
the alaskan eskimo
toot whistle plunk and boom
bear country
best documentary feature
best short subject cartoon
hans dreier
clint eastwood
65th
1992
unforgiven
77th
2004
million dollar baby
peter farrelly
roger k furse
21st
1948
hamlet
sheridan gibney
mel gibson
68th
1995
braveheart
michael gore
53rd
1980
fame
paul haggis
78th
2005
crash
marvin hamlisch
46th
1973
the way we were
the sting
leigh harline
13th
1940
pinocchio
edith head
all about eve
gordon hollingshead
18th
1945
hitler lives
star in the night
19th
1946
facing your danger
a boy and his dog
james horner
ron howard
74th
2001
a beautiful mind
justin hurwitz
89th
2016
la la land
john huston
the treasure of the sierra madre
alejandro gonzlez irritu
87th
2014
birdman or the unexpected virtue of ignorance
peter jackson
76th
2003
daniel scheinert
95th
2022
everything everywhere all at once
alan jay lerner
31st
1958
gigi
thomas little
henry mancini
34th
1961
breakfast at tiffanys
joseph l mankiewicz
22nd
1949
a letter to three wives
catherine martin
moulin rouge
the great gatsby
leo mccarey
17th
1944
going my way
frances mcdormand
93rd academy awards
films of 2020
2021
nomadland
best actress
alan menken
62nd
1989
the little mermaid
64th
1991
beauty and the beast
aladdin
pocahontas
ray moyer
walter murch
69th
1996
the english patient
best sound
christopher nolan
2023
oppenheimer
marc norman
71st
1998
shakespeare in love
paul n j ottosson
best sound effects editing
sydney pollack
58th
1985
out of africa
a r rahman
81st
2008
slumdog millionaire
tony richardson
36th
1963
tom jones
gary rydstrom
66th
1993
jurassic park
saving private ryan
stephen schwartz
edward selzer
so much for so little
for scentimental reasons
ben sharpsteen
white wilderness
ama girls
richard m sherman
mary poppins
robert b sherman
howard shore
steven spielberg
schindlers list
richard taylor
best visual effects
best makeup
dimitri tiomkin
25th
1952
high noon
john truscott
40th
1967
camelot
nick vallelonga
marcel verts
moulin rouge
fran walsh
ned washington
billy wilder
the lost weekend
33rd
1960
the apartment
stan winston
robert wise
west side story
38th
1965
the sound of music
joseph c wright
this above all
chlo zhao
fred zinnemann
a man for all seasons
academy of motion picture arts and sciences ampas
under the sea
beauty and the beast
a whole new world
colors of the wind
woman of color
nomadland
the lost weekend
records
most awards per ceremony
all four acting categories
all nominees
best actor
best supporting actor
best supporting actress
nonenglish acting noms
actor multinom years
oscar love curse
winning films
multinoms in same category
two acting awards for same film
foreignlanguage wins
foreignlanguage noms in other categories
international feature nominees
international feature count by country
best animated feature submissions
best documentary feature submissions
best animated short submissions
best documentary short submissions
animated feature noms in other categories
czech republic
united kingdom
ceremonies
awards for walt disney
posthumous wins and noms
best picture presenters
trophies on public display
oldest and youngest
women in nongendered categories
triple crown of acting
|
Links to external pages
Outloing links
www.wikidata.org
www.wikidata.org
www.oscars.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
www.wikimediafoundation.org
SEO Advice for en.wikipedia.org
In this section we provide pointers on how you can to optimize your web page so it can be found more easily by search engines and how to make it rank higher by optimizing the content of the page itself. For each of the individual criteria the maximum score is 100%. A score below 70% is considered to be indication that the page is not complying with general SEO standards and should be evaluated and/or fixed. Not every factor is weighted the same and some are not as important as others. Relatively unimportant factors like meta keywords are not included in the overall score.
Item | Factor | Pointers | |
---|---|---|---|
PageTitle | 100% | Far too many sites lack a page title. A page title is the first thing that shows in the search results so always use the title element. | |
Title relevance | 95% | A title should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 73 % match | |
Title Length | 70% | Limit your title to anywhere between 40 and 70 characters. Your title was 81 characters long | |
Meta Description | 0% | A meta description is the second element that shows in the search results so always use the meta description. | |
Meta description length | 0% | The meta description should be between 145 and 160 characters. This meta description is 1 characters long. | |
Meta description relevance | 0% | Meta Description should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Number of internal links | 30% | Linking to internal pages makes pages easier to find for search engines. Try to keep the number of links on your page roughly below 100. There are 740 internal links on this page. | |
Folder structure | 100% | We found a folder structure in the links on your page. A good folder structure makes a site easier to navigate. We found 3 level 1 folders and 6 folders above or in the first level of navigation. | |
Headings | 100% | Headers should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 50 % match | |
Links | 12% | Link anchors should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 6 % match | |
Image alt tags | 0% | Image alt tags should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Bold and italic | 30% | Bold and italic tags should reflect the contents of a site to some degree. This site has a 10 % match | |
Html ratio | 40% | Try to keep the html / text ratio as low as possible. More html means longer loading times. Layout should be handled in a serpate css file | |
Image descriptions | 57% | 57.142857142857 % of all images have been described via the "alt" attribute. Describing images with relevant text may lead to better results in the search engines. | |
Page errors | 100% | Pages with no errors display significantly faster on most browsers. We detected 0 errors and warnings | |
WordCount | 20% | An ideal page contains between 400 and 600 words.This page contains 2646 words | |
Server response time | 100% | A fast server speeds up a website. This server responds 92.54% faster then average | |
Gzip compression | 30% | This site does not use Gzip compression. Pages may not display as fast as they could | |
Keywords in Domainname | 30% | There are no important keywords in your domain name | |
Keywords in domain path | 100% | There are important keywords in the domain path | |
Structured Data | 100% | Structured data makes it easier for search engines to index your website | |
Inline css | 0% | Do not use inline css declarations. Inline css will slow down the rendering of the website. We detected 35 inline style declarations ( <a style="color:green">) with a size of 788 bytes | |
Excessive use of the same words | 100% | There is no indication that there are one or more keywords that are used excessively. | |
Frames or iframes | 100% | Perfect, detected not (i)frames on your webpagina | |
Flash | 100% | Perfect, we detected no flash objects on your page | |
Css | 30% | We detected too much (2) CSS files on your page. Css files block the loading of a webpage. | |
Javascript | 100% | Perfect, we did not detect too many blocking JavaScript files | |
Mobile Website | 100% | Perfect, we found a responsive design for mobile users | |
Most important heading | 100% | Perfect, we detected a correct use of the most important (h1) heading! | |
Normalized headings | 40% | We dit not font a normalized heading structure. A heading 2 (h2) for example should be followed by a heading of an equal level (h2), a child heading (h3) or even a aprent heading (h1). |
How would you like to have SEO advice for all your pages ?? Start your SEO Dashboard and optimize your website!
en.wikipedia.org images and descriptions
7 images found at en.wikipedia.org Images can improve the user experience for a website by making a pag visually appealing Images can also add extra keyword relevance to a webpage by using alt tags. Images can also slow down a website. If the width and height for a picture is not specified for a browser know in advance how large the image is. A browser must first load the picture and see before it knows how much space should be on the page. Upon reservation In the meantime, the browser can do little but wait. When the height and width for the plate are given in the HTML code, a browser just continues to build for a page while the images load in the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png height: 50 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg height: height attribute not set width: width attribute not set description: wikipedia |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg height: 13 width: 117 description: the free encyclopedia |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/96/symbol_category_class.svg/16px-symbol_category_class.svg.png height: 16 width: 16 description: no alt description found |
|
https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:centralautologin/start?type=1x1 height: 1 width: 1 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.png height: 31 width: 88 description: wikimedia foundation |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/poweredby_mediawiki_88x31.png height: 31 width: 88 description: powered by mediawiki |
How are images contributing to your SEO site-wise ? Your leading content tool has the awnsers!